You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot, I said that this could have been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago. And when you think about why, in the African-American community at least, there’s a lot of pain around what happened here, I think it’s important to recognize that the African- American community is looking at this issue through a set of experiences and a history that—that doesn’t go away.

There are very few African-American men in this country who haven’t had the experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department store. That includes me. And there are very few African-American men who haven’t had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of cars. That happens to me, at least before I was a senator. There are very few African-Americans who haven’t had the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman clutching her purse nervously and holding her breath until she had a chance to get off. That happens often.

And you know, I don’t want to exaggerate this, but those sets of experiences inform how the African-American community interprets what happened one night in Florida. And it’s inescapable for people to bring those experiences to bear.

The African-American community is also knowledgeable that there is a history of racial disparities in the application of our criminal laws, everything from the death penalty to enforcement of our drug laws. And that ends up having an impact in terms of how people interpret the case.

Now, this isn’t to say that the African-American community is naive about the fact that African-American young men are disproportionately involved in the criminal justice system, that they are disproportionately both victims and perpetrators of violence. It’s not to make excuses for that fact, although black folks do interpret the reasons for that in a historical context.

We understand that some of the violence that takes place in poor black neighborhoods around the country is born out of a very violent past in this country, and that the poverty and dysfunction that we see in those communities can be traced to a very difficult history.

And so the fact that sometimes that’s unacknowledged adds to the frustration. And the fact that a lot of African-American boys are painted with a broad brush and the excuse is given, well, there are these statistics out there that show that African-American boys are more violent — using that as an excuse to then see sons treated differently causes pain.

I think the African-American community is also not naive in understanding that statistically somebody like Trayvon Martin was probably statistically more likely to be shot by a peer than he was by somebody else.

So—so folks understand the challenges that exist for African-American boys, but they get frustrated, I think, if they feel that there’s no context for it or—and that context is being denied. And—and that all contributes, I think, to a sense that if a white male teen was involved in the same kind of scenario, that, from top to bottom, both the outcome and the aftermath might have been different.

President Obama

*slow clap*

I don’t give a damn what people have to say about this quote, whether White racists or ardent Black critics of President Obama. This moment is EVERYTHING. I too critique the President (often) but I can also give credit where due. It’s due.

Absolutely action—in terms of everything from legislation to social and cultural change—will have to occur. (He mentioned some ideas for ACTION during this speech. Full transcript here.) But since I am a critical thinker, I don’t have to pretend that either/or thinking where verbalism versus activism are enemies is what is occurring. As Paulo Freire wrote, critical reflection is also action. And this occurred on a national stage by a powerful person whose words matter and partly shapes culture.

In past critiques of President Obama, I mentioned that he specifically addressed women, LGBTQ, Jews, the poor, and the military before. All treated as “special" groups, but all involve Whites. This is why outrage at specifically addressing them is minimal compared to specifically addressing the pain of Black people, as a group. This is why the excuse “he isn’t just the President of Black America!” is thrown around by both his haters and supporters (ironically). White supremacist thinking is the culprit. But “everyone" can include specific addresses. And he did that today for Black people. And I appreciate it. It does MATTER. Validation of our lives MATTERS.

In this speech I hear intersectional thinking (he acknowledges that Black men perpetrate and suffer from violence. I discuss this often.) I hear him refuting the White supremacist lie that Black people “don’t care" when Black people are harmed by other Black people and that most crime is intraracial, in general. I hear acknowledgement of our pain and our humanity; of our complexity and the complexity of our lives. I LOVE the connection between poverty and crime and this country being a violent one. That is some history for that ass! (Poverty and crime as “abstract" and “pathological" figures in Black communities without connection to the larger American experience is an exercise in racism. Obama didn’t do that exercise today.) I love that basically a Black President publicly affirmed what Black people already knew; no, his election has not made America “post racial.“ Most importantly, I hear validation of Trayvon Martin’s life.

I know sometimes he specifically mentioned Black “men” here and in this context, it is fine with me. So if fellow womanists/feminists are mad at me, get on the list.

I affirm these words. They mean everything to me. And again, they may not to you but I am not you and this ain’t your blog. K? 

Thank you Mr. President. <3

(via gradientlair)